ACDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUV
1
indexChallenge Topic:How many particle images were initially selected?Was 2D classification performed?Were other particle screening method(s) used?Was 3D classification performed?Was local drift corrected in particle images before map refinement?Was exposure weighting performed on particle images before map refinement?What was the approximate CPU usage at this stage (before refinement)?How many particle images were included at the start of map refinement?How many particle images were included in the final map?Was local drift in particle images corrected at this stage?Was exposure weighting performed at this stage?Map Refinement CPU UsageMap resolutionHow was the map resolution determined? (annotated)What was the temperature factor applied?Map Filtering (annotated)Mask submittedVoxel sizeWas any other type of map validation performed?
2
104GroEL Simulated Data10000nonononono0100005006nono7.54.4gold standard FSC, 0.1430noneyes1.42no
3
120GroEL Simulated Data10000nonononono0100005088nono24604.3gold standard FSC, 0.1430Carbon cross section weightingyes1.42yes
4
132GroEL Simulated Data10000noyesnonono1100007967nono154.1gold standard FSC, 0.1430FSC-weightingno1.42no
5
143GroEL Simulated Data10000yesnononono171000010000nono1604.2gold standard FSC, 0.143302.621low passyes1.42no
6
153GroEL Simulated Data10000nonononono15100009915nono300005.7gold standard FSC, 0.143546noneno0.806357143no
7
158GroEL Simulated Data10000yesyesnonono50100009797nono10003.9gold standard FSC, 0.1430FSC-weighting, low pass, normalization, gaussianyes1.42yes
8
165GroEL Simulated Data10000nonononono21000010000nono13.9gold standard FSC, 0.143300FSC-weightingyes1.4199yes
9
168GroEL Simulated Data10000yesnononono41000010000nono7204.1gold standard FSC, 0.1430noneyes1.42no
10
169GroEL Simulated Data10000yesnononono41000010000nono1204.1gold standard FSC, 0.1430noneno1.42no