You are here

Model Submissions Summary

Model Challenge Analysis Website

http://model-compare.emdatabank.org

Statistics


  • 16 modellers submitted 106 entries total

 (statistics are preliminary, may change on review of the submissions)

Modelling Category

Optimized a current cryoEM model 47
Fitted/Optimized another known model 16
Created an ab initio model 44

 

Challenge Target

1. Tobacco Mosaic Virus 11
2. T20S Proteasome 18
3. GroEL 8
4. TRPVI Channel 13
5. Brome Mosaic Virus 12
6. β-Galactosidase 16
7. γ-Secretase 22
8. Ribosome 6

 

Was the model fitted to the "map A" or "map B" target?

Map A 80
Map B 27

 

Which target map was used for fitting?

primary map of the EMDB entry (emd_####.map) 83
original, unmodified map from reconstruction software (EMD-####-full.map) 15
half-map 1 for the FSC calculation (EMD-####-half-1.map) 9

 

Did you modify the provided map?

yes 60
no 47

 

Map preparation procedures used

  yes no
low pass filter 18 41
high pass filter 1 58
segmentation 41 19
applied a mask 27 33

 

Effort type

fully automated 66
partially automated, some manual steps 37
manual 4

 

Refinement space

real 96
reciprocal 11

 

Modelling software used

Chimera 35
COOT 25
direX 8
flex-EM 3
MDFF 6
phenix 63
pymol 1
rosetta 19
situs 1
TEMPy 3
VMD 6
other (describe below) 36

 

Which target criteria were used to identify model improvements?

map vs. model correlation coefficient 102
map vs. model FSC curve 12
energy function 35
cross-validation procedure 23
other 13

 

Was the map scale (voxel size) adjusted during the modelling process?

yes 9
no 98

 

Validation Checks

  yes no
internal model consistency 90 17
fit of model to the target map 105 2
fit of model to map other than target (cross-validation) 18 85

EMDataBank Validation Challenges are supported by NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences

Please send your challenge questions, comments and feedback to challenges@emdatabank.org

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer